Tag Archives: Norwich VT

Selectboard strips Finance Committee of independent role

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

Four years ago, in January 2021, members of Norwich’s Finance Committee resigned en masse, stating that their work felt “pointless” due to the Selectboard’s disinterest in their input. Since that time, the Selectboard has not addressed the underlying issues that prompted this exodus. Nor has the Town had a Finance Committee since then, because residents were uninterested in serving That changed recently when three well-qualified residents volunteered to serve. Their appointment at the March 26 Selectboard meeting established a quorum, Continue reading Selectboard strips Finance Committee of independent role→

A Divided Norwich Selectboard Grapples with Budget Oversight Responsibilities

Posted on by

How closely should the Selectboard examine the budget proposed by the Town Manager? That question dominated a contentious 100-minute discussion at last week’s Norwich Selectboard meeting that ended in a split 3-2 vote to advance a $6.7 million budget to voters at March Town Meeting. The proposed spending plan, which would increase property taxes by 24%, exposed deep divisions about the board’s oversight responsibilities. Selectboard members Arnold, Calloway and Layton voted in favor of the FY 26 budget while Smith Continue reading A Divided Norwich Selectboard Grapples with Budget Oversight Responsibilities→

Norwich Selectboard Scraps Town Manager’s Residency ‘Deadline’

Posted on by

Without public discussion or explanation, the Norwich Selectboard voted 3-2 to weaken a key provision of Town Manager Brennan Duffy’s contract. The change eliminates the ‘deadline’ for him to move to the Upper Valley, thereby cementing as permanent policy his working remotely two days a week. The vote took place on October 23, although an executive session occurred two weeks prior, in connection with the Town Manager’s annual evaluation. For some, this decision is a reminder of Mr. Duffy’s hiring Continue reading Norwich Selectboard Scraps Town Manager’s Residency ‘Deadline’→

Norwich’s Planning Commission Ponders Upzoning Options

Posted on by

Everybody knows housing in the Upper Valley is pricey and scarce. To address these issues, the Norwich, Vermont Planning Commission is looking into making targeted changes to its zoning regulations. The options under consideration are to allow higher-density housing, like accessory dwelling units and multi-family homes, in certain areas. This “upzoning” approach could create more housing without significantly altering the character of existing neighborhoods. Discussions are in the early stages, but Commission members broadly agree on many key concepts. However, Continue reading Norwich’s Planning Commission Ponders Upzoning Options→

A Taxpayer’s Perspective on the Norwich School Board Budget Guidelines

Posted on by

The Norwich School Board recently took the first step in shaping next year’s budget by adopting its “2025-26 Norwich Budget Guidelines.” As these early discussions begin, many of us in town are already feeling the strain from this year’s nearly 17% increase in school property taxes. Unfortunately, it is not going to get better. While Vermont’s funding system aims to promote a fairer distribution of resources across all schools, the reality is that some of us are left questioning how Continue reading A Taxpayer’s Perspective on the Norwich School Board Budget Guidelines→

How should Norwich use its opioid settlement funds?

Posted on by

Comedian and political commentator John Oliver recently covered the opioid crisis and the massive settlements on HBO’s “Last Week Tonight.” He highlighted the challenges states and municipalities face trying to use the money effectively, noting the painfully mixed results. Norwich faces a similar issue on a much, much smaller scale. It received $11,765 this fiscal year. Right now, the Town views the money as miscellaneous revenue, which is tragic (selfish?) considering the individuals and families that suffered as a result Continue reading How should Norwich use its opioid settlement funds?→

Zooming Out: Selectboard Meetings Going Fully Online

Posted on by

Count me among those concerned about the recent terse announcement that the Selectboard has ended in-person meetings in favor of attendance by Board members only via Zoom. The listserv post of May 9 says in full: Please be advised that, until further notice, all Selectboard meetings will be conducted via Zoom (remotely). Since the end of the Covid crisis, the Selectboard has used a hybrid meeting approach, combining in person attendance with participation via Zoom. However, all Board members generally Continue reading Zooming Out: Selectboard Meetings Going Fully Online→

Update on the Upper Loveland Road Solar Project: Developer Objects to PUC Order for Town Review

Posted on by

Is the controversial Upper Loveland Road solar project coming back to the Town of Norwich for review? The Public Utility Commission (PUC) recently issued an order directing the developer of the solar panel farm, an entity related to Norwich Technologies, to confirm ongoing support from the Town as a “preferred site.” The PUC order in that case (21-3587-NMP) specifies four significant changes to the project, since the developer made its presentation to the Planning Commission in July 2021, including increased Continue reading Update on the Upper Loveland Road Solar Project: Developer Objects to PUC Order for Town Review→

Increase class size at MCS?

Posted on by

Now that some dust has settled for this year on financing Act 127, I wonder if our School Board should address the difficult question of increasing class size (students per section) at Marion Cross School. Under H.850, which is now law, school boards can delay the vote on their budgets until April 15 in order to rework them. If I am correctly reading the materials from the Norwich Budget Presentation on December 6, 2023, MCS could go from three sections Continue reading Increase class size at MCS?→

Silent Rejection: Article 11 and the Selectboard’s Inaction

Posted on by

At Town Meeting in March 2023, Norwich residents approved Article 11, advising the Town “to consider” the addition of a fifth full-time officer to the Norwich Police Department (NPD). However, the Selectboard has quietly rejected this vote by finalizing next year’s budget without allocating funds for the additional position and more importantly for this post, without any discussion of Article 11. The Board’s rejection of the voters wish to consider the issue, without any kind of explanation, prompts questions about Continue reading Silent Rejection: Article 11 and the Selectboard’s Inaction→