TRORC dumps Norwich from Regional Energy Coordinator project

Two Rivers Ottauquechee Regional Commission (TRORC) has unilaterally dumped the Town of Norwich from the Regional Energy Coordinator pilot project. That decision is apparent from the series of emails in the Selectboard packet for the July 22 meeting, starting at page 153. Norwich’s sin: asking that the seven towns funding the project have a say in its administration.

My imperfect understanding is that seven towns banded together to hire a regional energy coordinator as a one year pilot project. Voters in Norwich approved participation and funding (≈$30,000) by passing Article 9. The coordinator position was “based at” TRORC according to the Town Meeting Article.

The coordinator’s work “will focus on energy efficiency, conservation, use, and renewable production by the participating towns in their operations,” according to the 6/29/20 draft agreement. See Selectboard packet for July 8 meeting, at page 37. The draft agreement also created a Steering Committee consisting of a representative from each participating town.

Concerns about the role of Steering Committee

The Town of Norwich raised concerns about the role of the Steering Committee. TRORC viewed the Committee as advisory. The Norwich Selectboard wanted the Committee to have greater sway.

In an email to Peter Gregory, the Executive Director of TRORC, Norwich Selectboard member John Langhus said,

The current draft of the Agreement was marked up by TRORC and has stripped away any meaningful participation by the Committee in the management of this relationship. A role that has no accountability except to Peteì Gregory, who himself has no accountability to our Towns, is very much at odds with what Norwich was pitched when considering this role and also with what was reflected in the initial draft of the Agreement. We have always envisioned this as multi-Town collaboration, with a facilitation role played by TRORC. Not as a new TRORC position with a rubber-stamp Committee.

The response from TRORC was swift, coming the next day, immediately after a emergency meeting of the TRORC Executive Committee. “Upon reflection on the concerns you and the Selectboard raised, it appears that the best thing for all parties, is to move forward without Norwich this year,” said Mr. Gregory in an email. “The urgency of the project for the remaining towns dictates that we move forward.”

Hmm. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out?

The materials in the Selectboard packet indicate that TRORC did not consult with the six other participating towns, before giving Norwich the boot.

What’s Next?

On Sunday, the Selectboard set a municipal tax rate that included funding for Article 9. That leaves the door open for a reconciliation. In addition, the Regional Energy Coordinator is topic number 7 on the Selectboard agenda for July 22.

Never miss a new post on the Norwich Observer. Subscribe to my blog by submitting your email address in the subscribe box in the right column above. Thanks!

3 Replies to “TRORC dumps Norwich from Regional Energy Coordinator project”

  1. It’s probably time to alert the legislature that the regional planning commissions scheme is unworkable without any ability to appeal the Commissions’ decisions. No governmental agency should operate without the citizens’ right to appeal the agency’s decisions and to hold the agency accountable to the citizens. The regional planning commissions function as promoters of development with little meaningful restriction, and unilateral decisions without accountability provide evidence that the commissions are rogue agents in our government.

    • I agree Ernie. Towns need more input into the whole process. It would be messier than the current, do as I say model the regional commission is running, but better. Also, let’s not forget, that the regional commissions get as much pressure from above as below. I do not envy the regional commissions any more or less than the local planners. No one has it easy when you have tell any Americans what to do. Masks anyone? But I completely agree that accountability to the people and real influence from the people are the only way forward.

  2. The role of TRORC here was to seemingly act as an administrator. It appears to have hijacked control for itself. Anyone know why?