{"id":1159,"date":"2020-07-14T19:13:14","date_gmt":"2020-07-14T19:13:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/?p=1159"},"modified":"2020-07-14T19:13:17","modified_gmt":"2020-07-14T19:13:17","slug":"article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/","title":{"rendered":"Article 8 &#8211; voting no, as a renovation project"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"476\" height=\"347\" src=\"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Opera-Snapshot_2020-07-11_190200_norwichenergycommittee.weebly.com_.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Opera-Snapshot_2020-07-11_190200_norwichenergycommittee.weebly.com_.png 476w, https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Opera-Snapshot_2020-07-11_190200_norwichenergycommittee.weebly.com_-300x219.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 476px) 100vw, 476px\" \/><figcaption>Could the Tracy Hall cupola house a WiFi or micro cell antenna?<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>I posted the following on the listserv today regarding the <a href=\"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/04\/04\/voters-to-reconsider-article-8-date-of-the-election-remains-uncertain-due-to-coronavirus\/\">re-vote on the Tracy Hall geothermal project<\/a>. Thought I would share it here. Following the listserv post, I add below an additional, out-of-box thought about the Tracy Hall cupola.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h6 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Listserv post<\/h6>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>Public officials tout the Tracy Hall geothermal project as a renovation project, primarily because approximately $1 million of the cost is dedicated to improving the ventilation system at Tracy Hall. However, viewed in that light, the project proposal strikes me as shortsighted.<\/p><p>The contractor will be ripping apart ceilings and walls to install the ventilation system. Yet, nothing is being done to upgrade the electrical or technology systems within those same walls. Upgrading, the technology systems is an item on the Town Manager\u2019s wish list.<\/p><p>At the November 20, 2019 Selectboard meeting, Mike Davey of EEI addressed briefly the question of other renovations. His suggestion was that the Town hire an architectural firm to examine reconfiguring the office and meeting space. Estimated cost: $10,000.\u00a0 The Selectboard did not follow-up on his suggestion. I don\u2019t know why. It struck me as a lost opportunity to improve Tracy Hall, at time when significant interior construction work was being done. \u00a0Penny wise and pound foolish?<\/p><p>Proponents of Article 8 say the Town needs to act\u00a0<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">now<\/span>\u00a0because the two oil-fired boilers that heat the building are nearing the end of their useful life. As I explained in a March blog post, the emergency is overstated. One example: neither boiler has broken down during Town Manager Durfee\u2019s tenure here. I invite you to read the full post:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/03\/01\/condition-of-tracy-hall-boilers-do-not-justify-rush-to-geothermal\/\">https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/03\/01\/condition-of-tracy-hall-boilers-do-not-justify-rush-to-geothermal\/<\/a><\/p><p>I have other concerns about the project. My overarching concern is that the project was rushed to the ballot in March. Since that time, public officials decided to stay with the original plan. Spending $3 million of taxpayer money is a big deal. Yes, climate change is real. But, we need a more thoughtful and broad-based approach before spending that kind of money.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h6 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Out-of-box on the Tracy Hall cupola <\/h6>\n\n\n\n<p>While stuffing the Tracy Hall attic with insulation, perhaps the Town could place a WiFi antenna in the cupola. Free public WiFi on the Green! Better cell phone reception at Marion Cross School. And, in the age of Covid-19, a hot spot for K-12 students without broadband at home. Remember the micro cell antenna <a aria-label=\"undefined (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/norwichobserver.blogspot.com\/2017\/10\/update-verizon-wireless-proposed-cell.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Verizon Wireless wanted to put on the Green<\/a>? Offer the cupola as a site to carriers. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-background has-small-font-size has-blue-color has-medium-gray-background-color\"><strong><em>Thanks for reading my blog. If you want to subscribe, please submit your email address in the subscribe box in the right hand column above.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I posted the following on the listserv today regarding the re-vote on the Tracy Hall geothermal project. Thought I would share it here. Following the listserv post, I add below an additional, out-of-box thought about the Tracy Hall cupola. Listserv post Public officials tout the Tracy Hall geothermal project as a renovation project, primarily because approximately $1 million of the cost is dedicated to improving the ventilation system at Tracy Hall. However, viewed in that light, the project proposal strikes <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">  Article 8 &#8211; voting no, as a renovation project<\/span><span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1150,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[42],"class_list":["post-1159","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-2-million-bond-for-geothermal","tag-norwich-vt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Article 8 - voting no, as a renovation project - Norwich Observer<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Article 8 - voting no, as a renovation project - Norwich Observer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I posted the following on the listserv today regarding the re-vote on the Tracy Hall geothermal project. Thought I would share it here. Following the listserv post, I add below an additional, out-of-box thought about the Tracy Hall cupola. Listserv post Public officials tout the Tracy Hall geothermal project as a renovation project, primarily because approximately $1 million of the cost is dedicated to improving the ventilation system at Tracy Hall. However, viewed in that light, the project proposal strikes Continue reading  Article 8 &#8211; voting no, as a renovation project&rarr;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Norwich Observer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-14T19:13:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-14T19:13:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Opera-Snapshot_2020-07-11_190200_norwichenergycommittee.weebly.com_.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"476\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"347\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"CTK\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"CTK\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/14\\\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/14\\\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"CTK\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7c777bca932c48863421eb322d49c18d\"},\"headline\":\"Article 8 &#8211; voting no, as a renovation project\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-14T19:13:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-14T19:13:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/14\\\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":451,\"commentCount\":1,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/14\\\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/Opera-Snapshot_2020-07-11_190200_norwichenergycommittee.weebly.com_.png\",\"keywords\":[\"Norwich VT\"],\"articleSection\":[\"$2 million bond for geothermal\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/14\\\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/14\\\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/14\\\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\\\/\",\"name\":\"Article 8 - voting no, as a renovation project - Norwich Observer\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/14\\\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/14\\\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/Opera-Snapshot_2020-07-11_190200_norwichenergycommittee.weebly.com_.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-14T19:13:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-14T19:13:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7c777bca932c48863421eb322d49c18d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/14\\\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/14\\\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/14\\\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/Opera-Snapshot_2020-07-11_190200_norwichenergycommittee.weebly.com_.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/Opera-Snapshot_2020-07-11_190200_norwichenergycommittee.weebly.com_.png\",\"width\":476,\"height\":347},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/07\\\/14\\\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Article 8 &#8211; voting no, as a renovation project\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Norwich Observer\",\"description\":\"Occasional news and commentary about local government in Norwich, VT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7c777bca932c48863421eb322d49c18d\",\"name\":\"CTK\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/11840c9a170ac22dbf5bc0397622f4e4.jpg?ver=1776127237\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/11840c9a170ac22dbf5bc0397622f4e4.jpg?ver=1776127237\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/11840c9a170ac22dbf5bc0397622f4e4.jpg?ver=1776127237\",\"caption\":\"CTK\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/norwichobserver.com\\\/index.php\\\/author\\\/ctk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Article 8 - voting no, as a renovation project - Norwich Observer","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Article 8 - voting no, as a renovation project - Norwich Observer","og_description":"I posted the following on the listserv today regarding the re-vote on the Tracy Hall geothermal project. Thought I would share it here. Following the listserv post, I add below an additional, out-of-box thought about the Tracy Hall cupola. Listserv post Public officials tout the Tracy Hall geothermal project as a renovation project, primarily because approximately $1 million of the cost is dedicated to improving the ventilation system at Tracy Hall. However, viewed in that light, the project proposal strikes Continue reading  Article 8 &#8211; voting no, as a renovation project&rarr;","og_url":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/","og_site_name":"Norwich Observer","article_published_time":"2020-07-14T19:13:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-14T19:13:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":476,"height":347,"url":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Opera-Snapshot_2020-07-11_190200_norwichenergycommittee.weebly.com_.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"CTK","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"CTK","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/"},"author":{"name":"CTK","@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7c777bca932c48863421eb322d49c18d"},"headline":"Article 8 &#8211; voting no, as a renovation project","datePublished":"2020-07-14T19:13:14+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-14T19:13:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/"},"wordCount":451,"commentCount":1,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Opera-Snapshot_2020-07-11_190200_norwichenergycommittee.weebly.com_.png","keywords":["Norwich VT"],"articleSection":["$2 million bond for geothermal"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/","url":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/","name":"Article 8 - voting no, as a renovation project - Norwich Observer","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Opera-Snapshot_2020-07-11_190200_norwichenergycommittee.weebly.com_.png","datePublished":"2020-07-14T19:13:14+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-14T19:13:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7c777bca932c48863421eb322d49c18d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Opera-Snapshot_2020-07-11_190200_norwichenergycommittee.weebly.com_.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Opera-Snapshot_2020-07-11_190200_norwichenergycommittee.weebly.com_.png","width":476,"height":347},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/2020\/07\/14\/article-8-voting-no-as-a-renovation-project\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Article 8 &#8211; voting no, as a renovation project"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/","name":"Norwich Observer","description":"Occasional news and commentary about local government in Norwich, VT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7c777bca932c48863421eb322d49c18d","name":"CTK","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/11840c9a170ac22dbf5bc0397622f4e4.jpg?ver=1776127237","url":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/11840c9a170ac22dbf5bc0397622f4e4.jpg?ver=1776127237","contentUrl":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/11840c9a170ac22dbf5bc0397622f4e4.jpg?ver=1776127237","caption":"CTK"},"url":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/author\/ctk\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1159","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1159"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1159\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1170,"href":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1159\/revisions\/1170"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1150"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1159"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1159"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/norwichobserver.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1159"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}